<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Supreme Court Hands Down Wikipedia Opinion, Traditional Marriage in Shambles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outragedrichard.com/home/california-supreme-court-hands-down-wikipedia-opinion-traditional-marriage-in-shambles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outragedrichard.com/home/california-supreme-court-hands-down-wikipedia-opinion-traditional-marriage-in-shambles/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:36:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Outraged Richard &#8250; Carrie Prejean Update: California Marriage in Name Only. Marriage Versus Domestic Partnership. What&#8217;s in a Name?</title>
		<link>http://outragedrichard.com/home/california-supreme-court-hands-down-wikipedia-opinion-traditional-marriage-in-shambles/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Outraged Richard &#8250; Carrie Prejean Update: California Marriage in Name Only. Marriage Versus Domestic Partnership. What&#8217;s in a Name?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outragedrichard.com/home/2008/05/16/california-supreme-court/#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>[...] Because of this nomenclature only difference there is a very credible argument to be made by equal rights protection for same sex unions to be considered marriage, as was found by the California Supreme Court&#8217;s Wikipedia entry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Because of this nomenclature only difference there is a very credible argument to be made by equal rights protection for same sex unions to be considered marriage, as was found by the California Supreme Court&#8217;s Wikipedia entry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outraged Richard &#8250; Iowa Insanity: The Court Rejected any Argument for the Natural Family as the Best Setting for Child-rearing as a Mere &#8220;Stereotype&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outragedrichard.com/home/california-supreme-court-hands-down-wikipedia-opinion-traditional-marriage-in-shambles/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Outraged Richard &#8250; Iowa Insanity: The Court Rejected any Argument for the Natural Family as the Best Setting for Child-rearing as a Mere &#8220;Stereotype&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outragedrichard.com/home/2008/05/16/california-supreme-court/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>[...] Iowa, one of the most conservative states in the nation has gone certifiably insane, as California has already: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iowa, one of the most conservative states in the nation has gone certifiably insane, as California has already: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
